Magnitude 1.4 Earthquake Struck 10 km NW of Fishhook, Alaska on November 30, 2024 11:38:59
Last Updated: 2024-11-30 11:40:57On November 30, 2024 11:38:59 an earthquake with magnitude of 1.4 on the richter scale hit 10 km NW of Fishhook, Alaska. The earthquake originated at a depth of approximately 39.6 kilometers below the Earth's surface on longitude -149.374Β° and latitude 61.811Β°. According to documented reports people felt the earth quake, No tsunami was triggered due to the earthquake.
Magnitude & Depth
The earthquake that appeared on November 30, 2024 11:38:59 had a magnitude of 1.4 on the richter scale.
Shallow earthquakes are considered between 0 and 70 km deep, while intermediate earthquakes range from 70 - 300 km deep and deep earthquakes are between 300 - 700 km deep.
Are shallow earthquakes more destructive?
Shallow quakes generally tend to be more damaging than deeper quakes. Seismic waves from deep quakes have to travel farther to the surface, losing energy along the way.
Nearby Cities and Towns
The nearest significant population center is Fishhook in Alaska, United States, located 10 kilometers or 6 miles β SE of the earthquake's epicenter. Other cities in close proximity include Tanaina (Alaska, United States) located 20 km (12 mi) β S and Lakes (Alaska, United States) located 22 km (14 mi) β SE of the epicenter.
In total, we found 17 cities in our database that might have been impacted by the earthquake.
Distance | Direction | City | State | Country |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 km (6 mi) | β SE | Fishhook | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
20 km (12 mi) | β S | Tanaina | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
22 km (14 mi) | β SE | Lakes | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
22 km (14 mi) | β SE | Farm Loop | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
23 km (14 mi) | β S | Meadow Lakes | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
25 km (16 mi) | β S | Wasilla | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
27 km (17 mi) | β SE | Gateway | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
27 km (16 mi) | β SE | Palmer | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
30 km (19 mi) | β SW | Houston | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
35 km (22 mi) | β SW | Willow | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
35 km (21 mi) | β S | Knik-Fairview | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
44 km (27 mi) | β S | Big Lake | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
55 km (34 mi) | β S | Eagle River | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
63 km (39 mi) | β S | Elmendorf Air Force Base | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
71 km (44 mi) | β S | Anchorage | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
71 km (44 mi) | β SE | Anchorage Municipality | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
97 km (60 mi) | β SE | Girdwood | Alaska | πΊπΈ United States |
Nearby Power Plants
We found a total 8 utility-scale power plants in the vecinity of the earthquakes epicenter. The closest being Eklutna Hydro Project Hydro power plant, located 39 kilometers (24 miles) β SE from the epicenter.
Distance | Direction | Power Plant | Type | Capacity |
---|---|---|---|---|
39 km (24 mi) | β SE | Eklutna Hydro Project | Hydro | 44.4 MW |
39 km (24 mi) | β SE | Eklutna Generation Station | Gas | 171.0 MW |
59 km (37 mi) | β S | JBER Landfill Gas Power Plant | Waste | 11.5 MW |
67 km (41 mi) | β S | George M Sullivan Generation Plant 2 | Gas | 346.9 MW |
70 km (43 mi) | β S | Anchorage 1 | Gas | 77.9 MW |
76 km (47 mi) | β S | International | Gas | 30.0 MW |
76 km (47 mi) | β S | Southcentral Power Project | Gas | 203.9 MW |
88 km (55 mi) | β S | Fire Island Wind | Wind | 18.0 MW |
Power Plants & Risks During Earthquakes
We found 4 types of power plants in the vecinity of the magnitude 1.4 earthquake that struck 10 km NW of Fishhook, Alaska on November 30, 2024 11:38:59. These types were Waste power plants, Hydro power plants, Wind power plants, Gas power plants, below you find information how each type of power plant can pose a risk to you as a person or the ecosytem around you.
None of this information should be used as guidence in an event of an emergency, but rather as additional references to information provided by national, state and local authorities.Hydropower
Hydropower plants are generally considered as safe in many aspects, but when it comes to severe earthquakes they pose a substantial risk that can manifest in the form of dam faliours, landslides and grave impacts on surrounding ecosystems.
Dam Failure
The most significant risk is the potential failure of the dam that holds the water reservoir. Severe ground shaking can damage or breach the dam, leading to downstream flooding and as a result endangering people and wildlife living downstream. Such an event can also have severe impact on key infrastructure that cascades through society.
Landslides
Earthquakes can trigger landslides in the areas surrounding hydropower plants, potentially damaging infrastructure and causing harm to nearby communities.
Damage to Aquatic Ecosystems
Both landslide and dam failures can have a severe impact on upstream and downstream aquatic wildlife, ecosystem and groundwater, resulting in longterm risks for people and industires living and operating in areas near the water supply.
To mitigate these risks, engineering and construction standards for hydropower plants often include earthquake-resistant designs. These designs incorporate measures such as flexible foundations, strengthened dam structures, and advanced monitoring systems to detect early signs of stress. Additionally, emergency plans and evacuation procedures should be in place to protect personnel and downstream communities in the event of a severe earthquake.
Gas Power
Gas power plants can pose significant risks to people and the environment in their vicinity during earthquakes.
Gas Leaks and Fires
Gas power plants rely on natural gas, which can leak from pipelines and equipment when damaged by seismic activity. These leaks can lead to fires and explosions, endangering people in the plant's vicinity.
Impact on Air Quality
Gas power plants emit pollutants, and fires caused by gas leaks during an earthquake can release harmful substances into the air. This can pose health risks to nearby residents.
Environmental Impact
Gas leaks can also harm the local environment, potentially contaminating soil and water sources.
To mitigate these risks, most modern gas power plants have robust safety measures in place, including gas leak detection systems, emergency response plans, and communication protocols to alert nearby communities in case of an incident. Additionally, local authorities should conduct risk assessments and ensure that emergency services are well-prepared to respond to potential hazards posed by gas power plants during earthquakes.
Wind Power
In the event of a severe earthquake, wind power plants typically pose lower risks to people and ecosystems compared to some other types of power generation, such as nuclear or fossil fuel power plants. Below you'll find potential risks to still consider.
Turbine Collapse
The most significant risk to people is the potential collapse of wind turbine towers during a severe earthquake. If a wind turbine were to collapse, it could cause injury or loss of life to anyone in the vicinity.
Wildlife Impact
Wind turbines can pose a risk to local wildlife. In the event of an earthquake, there could be concerns about the displacement or injury of wildlife in the vicinity of the turbines or wild fires resulting from internal malfunction of turbines.
While wind power plants do have risks associated with earthquakes, they are generally considered to be a lower-risk energy source in terms of environmental and safety concerns when compared to certain other forms of power generation. Proper planning, engineering, and maintenance practices help mitigate these risks and ensure the safe operation of wind power plants during earthquakes.
Data Information
Information found on this page is a derivative set, based on sources mentioned below.
Data Sources
We aggregate and combine data from USGS (United States Geographical Survey) and the EMSC (European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre). This allow us to get near real-time and historical earthquake data dating back to the year 1950.
Disclaimer
Information or data found on this page should not be used for, or as an early warning system. It is intended as an historical reference or near real-time complementary information to offical and governmental sources. In an event of an emergency it is important closely monitor and follow advice from national, state and local authorities.