Magnitude 1.7 Earthquake Struck 9 km NW of Avenal, CA on October 02, 2024 04:32:34

Last Updated: 2024-10-04 16:37:30

On October 02, 2024 04:32:34 an earthquake with magnitude of 1.7 on the richter scale hit 9 km NW of Avenal, CA. The earthquake originated at a depth of approximately 9.2 kilometers below the Earth's surface on longitude -120.206Β° and latitude 36.062Β°. According to documented reports people felt the earth quake, No tsunami was triggered due to the earthquake.

Magnitude & Depth

The earthquake that appeared on October 02, 2024 04:32:34 had a magnitude of 1.7 on the richter scale.

Shallow earthquakes are considered between 0 and 70 km deep, while intermediate earthquakes range from 70 - 300 km deep and deep earthquakes are between 300 - 700 km deep.

Are shallow earthquakes more destructive?

Shallow quakes generally tend to be more damaging than deeper quakes. Seismic waves from deep quakes have to travel farther to the surface, losing energy along the way.

Nearby Cities and Towns

The nearest significant population center is Avenal in California, United States, located 9 kilometers or 5 miles β†’ E of the earthquake's epicenter. Other cities in close proximity include Coalinga (California, United States) located 16 km (10 mi) ← W and Huron (California, United States) located 18 km (11 mi) ↑ N of the epicenter.

In total, we found 31 cities in our database that might have been impacted by the earthquake.

Distance Direction City State Country
9 km (5 mi) β†’ E Avenal California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
16 km (10 mi) ← W Coalinga California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
18 km (11 mi) ↑ N Huron California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
22 km (14 mi) β†’ E Kettleman City California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
35 km (21 mi) β†— NE Lemoore Station California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
35 km (21 mi) β†— NE Kings County California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
37 km (23 mi) β†— NE Stratford California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
46 km (28 mi) β†— NE Lemoore California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
47 km (29 mi) ↓ S Shandon California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
51 km (31 mi) ↑ N Riverdale California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
52 km (32 mi) β†— NE Armona California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
56 km (34 mi) ↙ SW San Miguel California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
57 km (35 mi) β†— NE Home Garden California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
58 km (36 mi) β†— NE Hanford California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
58 km (36 mi) β†— NE Corcoran California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
60 km (37 mi) β†— NE Lucerne California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
62 km (38 mi) β†— NE Laton California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
62 km (39 mi) ↑ N Caruthers California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
65 km (40 mi) ↓ S Paso Robles California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
67 km (42 mi) β†˜ SE Lost Hills California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
71 km (44 mi) ↙ SW Lake Nacimiento California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
72 km (45 mi) ↓ S Templeton California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
76 km (47 mi) ↓ S Atascadero California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
77 km (47 mi) β†— NE Kingsburg California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
78 km (48 mi) ↓ S San Luis Obispo County California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
83 km (51 mi) ↓ S Santa Margarita California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
92 km (57 mi) ↓ S Cayucos California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
95 km (59 mi) ↓ S San Luis Obispo California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
96 km (60 mi) ↓ S Morro Bay California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
100 km (62 mi) ↓ S Los Osos California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
109 km (67 mi) ↓ S Avila Beach California πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States

Nearby Power Plants

We found a total 92 utility-scale power plants in the vecinity of the earthquakes epicenter. The closest being DSH (CA) - Coalinga State Hospital Solar power plant, located 8 kilometers (5 miles) β†– NW from the epicenter.

Distance Direction Power Plant Type Capacity
8 km (5 mi) β†– NW DSH (CA) - Coalinga State Hospital Solar 2.0 MW
8 km (5 mi) β†˜ SE CED Avenal Solar 15.8 MW
8 km (5 mi) β†– NW CDCR (CA) - Pleasant Valley State Prison Solar 1.2 MW
11 km (7 mi) β†’ E Avenal Park Solar 6.0 MW
11 km (6 mi) ↑ N West Gates Solar Station Solar 10.0 MW
12 km (7 mi) β†˜ SE Sun City Project LLC Solar 20.0 MW
12 km (7 mi) β†˜ SE Sand Drag LLC Solar 19.0 MW
14 km (8 mi) β†— NE Westlands Solar PV Farm Solar 18.0 MW
15 km (9 mi) ↑ N Gates Solar Station Solar 20.0 MW
18 km (11 mi) ← W Coalinga Cogeneration Facility Gas 6.8 MW
20 km (12 mi) ← W Coalinga 25D Cogen Gas 13.6 MW
20 km (12 mi) β†— NE Huron Solar Station Solar 20.0 MW
21 km (13 mi) ← W Coalinga Cogeneration Gas 38.4 MW
22 km (14 mi) β†– NW Coalinga 6C Cogen Gas 6.8 MW
23 km (14 mi) β†’ E Kettleman Solar -Centaurus Solar 20.0 MW
31 km (19 mi) β†— NE Westside Solar Power PV1 Solar 2.0 MW
32 km (20 mi) β†— NE RE Kent South LLC Solar 20.0 MW
32 km (20 mi) β†— NE RE Mustang LLC Solar 100.0 MW
33 km (20 mi) β†— NE Henrietta Peaker Gas 98.0 MW
35 km (22 mi) ↑ N Westside Solar Station Solar 15.0 MW
35 km (22 mi) ↑ N Whitney Point Solar Solar 20.0 MW
36 km (22 mi) β†– NW Five Points Solar Park Solar 60.0 MW
36 km (22 mi) ↑ N NextEra Westside PV Solar 20.0 MW
38 km (24 mi) ↑ N Five Points Solar Station Solar 15.0 MW
38 km (23 mi) β†— NE RE Kansas South LLC Solar 20.0 MW
39 km (24 mi) β†— NE Henrietta Solar Project Solar 102.0 MW
39 km (24 mi) β†— NE RE Kansas Solar LLC Solar 20.0 MW
42 km (26 mi) β†— NE Lemoore 1 Solar 1.5 MW
42 km (26 mi) β†– NW Cantua Solar Station Solar 20.0 MW
46 km (28 mi) β†˜ SE Coronal Lost Hills Solar 20.0 MW
49 km (30 mi) β†— NE Verwey-Hanford Dairy Digester #2 Biomass 1.0 MW
49 km (30 mi) β†— NE Verwey-Hanford Dairy Digester #1 Biomass 1.0 MW
49 km (30 mi) β†— NE Verwey-Hanford Dairy Digester #3 Biomass 1.0 MW
50 km (31 mi) β†˜ SE Morelos del Sol Solar 15.0 MW
51 km (31 mi) β†— NE Guernsey Solar Station Solar 20.0 MW
51 km (32 mi) ↑ N San Joaquin Solar Solar 21.3 MW
52 km (32 mi) ↓ S CA Flats Solar 150 LLC Solar 150.0 MW
52 km (32 mi) ↓ S CA Flats Solar 130 LLC Solar 130.0 MW
52 km (32 mi) ↑ N Stroud Solar Station Solar 20.0 MW
52 km (32 mi) β†– NW Giffen Solar 10.0 MW
53 km (33 mi) β†˜ SE Roll Lost Hills Gas 1.1 MW
54 km (33 mi) ↓ S Meridian Vineyards Solar 1.1 MW
54 km (33 mi) β†– NW Giffen Solar Park Solar 20.0 MW
55 km (34 mi) β†— NE Hanford Energy Park Peaker Gas 92.2 MW
56 km (35 mi) β†— NE Corcoran Solar 3 Solar 20.0 MW
56 km (35 mi) β†— NE Corcoran Solar 2 Solar 19.8 MW
56 km (34 mi) β†– NW Aspiration G Solar 9.0 MW
57 km (35 mi) β†— NE Corcoran Solar Solar 20.0 MW
57 km (35 mi) β†— NE Corcoran Solar 1.1 MW
58 km (36 mi) β†˜ SE Lost Hills/Blackwell Solar 32.0 MW
58 km (36 mi) β†— NE CID Solar (CA) Solar 2.0 MW
58 km (36 mi) β†— NE CDCR (CA) - Corcoran State Prison Solar 5.0 MW
58 km (36 mi) β†— NE Hanford 1 and 2 Solar 3.0 MW
58 km (36 mi) ↙ SW Sargent Canyon Cogeneration Gas 38.2 MW
58 km (36 mi) β†— NE CID Solar LLC Solar 20.0 MW
59 km (36 mi) β†˜ SE Lost Hills Cogeneration Plant Gas 10.5 MW
59 km (36 mi) β†— NE Cottonwood Solar LLC (City of Corcoran) Solar 12.0 MW
59 km (37 mi) β†˜ SE Blackwell Solar Park Solar 20.0 MW
60 km (37 mi) ↙ SW Aera San Ardo Cogen Facility Gas 6.2 MW
60 km (37 mi) ↙ SW Salinas River Cogeneration Gas 38.9 MW
63 km (39 mi) β†˜ SE Nickel 1 Solar Facility Solar 1.5 MW
67 km (42 mi) ↙ SW Nacimiento Hydro Project Hydro 4.4 MW
70 km (43 mi) ↓ S Vintner Solar Solar 1.5 MW
74 km (46 mi) β†˜ SE Topaz Solar Farm Solar 585.9 MW
74 km (46 mi) β†’ E Wildwood Solar II Solar 15.0 MW
75 km (46 mi) β†’ E Wildwood Solar I LLC Solar 19.5 MW
76 km (47 mi) β†’ E Cottonwood Solar LLC (Goose Lake) Solar 12.0 MW
77 km (48 mi) β†˜ SE Elk Hills Cogen Gas 46.6 MW
77 km (48 mi) β†— NE Kingsburg Cogen Gas 36.2 MW
77 km (48 mi) β†— NE Kingsburg Solar Solar 3.7 MW
82 km (51 mi) β†˜ SE South Belridge Cogeneration Facility Gas 94.2 MW
86 km (53 mi) β†˜ SE Rio Bravo Solar 1 LLC Solar 20.0 MW
86 km (53 mi) β†˜ SE California Valley Solar Ranch Solar 249.8 MW
88 km (54 mi) β†˜ SE Rio Bravo Solar II LLC Solar 20.0 MW
91 km (56 mi) β†˜ SE Cymric 36W Cogen Gas 12.4 MW
92 km (57 mi) β†˜ SE Cymric 31X Cogen Gas 6.8 MW
92 km (57 mi) β†˜ SE Welport Lease Project Gas 5.0 MW
93 km (58 mi) ↓ S Stenner Creek Solar Solar 4.5 MW
94 km (58 mi) β†˜ SE Cymric 6Z Cogen Gas 6.8 MW
96 km (59 mi) β†˜ SE McKittrick Cogen Gas 12.0 MW
96 km (59 mi) β†˜ SE McKittrick Limited Gas 46.0 MW
99 km (61 mi) β†˜ SE Berry NMW Cogens Gas 9.6 MW
99 km (61 mi) β†˜ SE Pumpjack Solar I Solar 20.0 MW
101 km (63 mi) β†˜ SE La Paloma Generating Plant Gas 1200.0 MW
103 km (64 mi) ↓ S Cold Canyon 1 Waste 1.5 MW
103 km (64 mi) β†˜ SE North Midway Cogen Gas 10.5 MW
104 km (64 mi) ↓ S Thomas M Knott Cogen Facility Gas 1.4 MW
106 km (66 mi) β†˜ SE Midway Sunset Cogen Gas 234.0 MW
109 km (67 mi) β†˜ SE Dome Project Gas 6.0 MW
110 km (68 mi) β†˜ SE Sunrise Power LLC Gas 605.4 MW
111 km (69 mi) ↓ S Diablo Canyon Nuclear 2323.0 MW
112 km (69 mi) β†˜ SE Mid-Set Cogeneration Gas 39.1 MW

Power Plants & Risks During Earthquakes

We found 6 types of power plants in the vecinity of the magnitude 1.7 earthquake that struck 9 km NW of Avenal, CA on October 02, 2024 04:32:34. These types were Hydro power plants, Nuclear power plants, Biomass power plants, Solar power plants, Waste power plants, Gas power plants, below you find information how each type of power plant can pose a risk to you as a person or the ecosytem around you.

None of this information should be used as guidence in an event of an emergency, but rather as additional references to information provided by national, state and local authorities.

Hydropower

Hydropower plants are generally considered as safe in many aspects, but when it comes to severe earthquakes they pose a substantial risk that can manifest in the form of dam faliours, landslides and grave impacts on surrounding ecosystems.

Dam Failure

The most significant risk is the potential failure of the dam that holds the water reservoir. Severe ground shaking can damage or breach the dam, leading to downstream flooding and as a result endangering people and wildlife living downstream. Such an event can also have severe impact on key infrastructure that cascades through society.

Landslides

Earthquakes can trigger landslides in the areas surrounding hydropower plants, potentially damaging infrastructure and causing harm to nearby communities.

Damage to Aquatic Ecosystems

Both landslide and dam failures can have a severe impact on upstream and downstream aquatic wildlife, ecosystem and groundwater, resulting in longterm risks for people and industires living and operating in areas near the water supply.

To mitigate these risks, engineering and construction standards for hydropower plants often include earthquake-resistant designs. These designs incorporate measures such as flexible foundations, strengthened dam structures, and advanced monitoring systems to detect early signs of stress. Additionally, emergency plans and evacuation procedures should be in place to protect personnel and downstream communities in the event of a severe earthquake.

Nuclean Power

Nuclear power plant bear an inherent risk during earthquake events, as we all witnessed on 11 of Mars 2011 in Fukushima. However, According to the World Nuclear Association, nuclear facilities are designed to witstand earthquakes.

"Nuclear facilities are designed so that earthquakes and other external events will not jeopardise the safety of the plant. In France for instance, nuclear plants are designed to withstand an earthquake twice as strong as the 1000-year event calculated for each site. It is estimated that, worldwide, 20% of nuclear reactors are operating in areas of significant seismic activity. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has a Safety Guide on Seismic Risks for Nuclear Power Plants. Various systems are used in planning, including Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA), which is recommended by IAEA and widely accepted."

"Peak ground acceleration (PGA) or design basis earthquake ground motion (DBGM) is measured in Galileo units – Gal (cm/sec2) or g – the force of gravity, one g being 980 Gal. PGA has long been considered an unsatisfactory indicator of damage to structures, and some seismologists are proposing to replace it with cumulative average velocity (CAV) as a more useful metric than ground acceleration since it brings in displacement and duration and "operators are able to determine the absence of potential damages with high confidence" according to the IAEA."

"The logarithmic Richter magnitude scale (or more precisely the Moment Magnitude Scale more generally used today*) measures the overall energy released in an earthquake, and there is not always a good correlation between that and intensity (ground motion) in a particular place. Japan has a seismic intensity scale in shindo units 0 to 7, with weak/strong divisions at levels 5 and 6, hence ten levels. This describes the surface intensity at particular places, rather than the magnitude of the earthquake itself."

Gas Power

Gas power plants can pose significant risks to people and the environment in their vicinity during earthquakes.

Gas Leaks and Fires

Gas power plants rely on natural gas, which can leak from pipelines and equipment when damaged by seismic activity. These leaks can lead to fires and explosions, endangering people in the plant's vicinity.

Impact on Air Quality

Gas power plants emit pollutants, and fires caused by gas leaks during an earthquake can release harmful substances into the air. This can pose health risks to nearby residents.

Environmental Impact

Gas leaks can also harm the local environment, potentially contaminating soil and water sources.

To mitigate these risks, most modern gas power plants have robust safety measures in place, including gas leak detection systems, emergency response plans, and communication protocols to alert nearby communities in case of an incident. Additionally, local authorities should conduct risk assessments and ensure that emergency services are well-prepared to respond to potential hazards posed by gas power plants during earthquakes.

Solar Power

Solar power plants generally pose fewer risks compared to conventional power plants that use fossil fuels or nuclear energy. However, they are not without their own set of potential risks and challenges. Below you can find some of the risks associated with solar power plants in an event of a severe earthquake.

Environmental Impact

The production of solar panels involves the use of various materials, including rare metals and chemicals. Severe earthquakes could potentially introduce these into the ecosystems of their location.

Fire Risk

Although the solar panels themselves are not typically a fire hazard, electrical components like inverters and batterises that store the electricity can pose a risk. Electrical malfunctions or faults can lead to fires, especially in poorly maintained systems in an event of a severe earthquake, and thus pose a longterm risk for the local ecosystem.

Overall, the mitigation of risks associated with utility-scale solar power plants involves a combination of technological advancements, sustainable practices, regulatory adherence, and ongoing monitoring and maintenance.

Biomass Power

Biomass power plants, which generate electricity by burning organic materials like wood, agricultural residues, or waste, can pose certain risks during earthquakes. While biomass power plants are generally considered less hazardous than some other types of power generation facilities, yet there are still potential risks to be aware of.

Fire Risk

One of the primary risks associated with biomass power plants during earthquakes is the potential for fires. The shaking during an earthquake can damage electrical systems, equipment, and fuel storage, which may lead to electrical faults and fires.

Fuel Handling

Earthquakes can disrupt the fuel handling systems in a biomass plant, potentially causing spills or accidents related to the storage and transportation of biomass feedstock.

It's important to note that the specific risks associated with biomass power plants can vary based on factors such as plant size, location, and design. The biomass power industry prioritizes safety and works closely with regulatory authorities to ensure that biomass energy is generated with minimal risk to people and the environment, even in earthquake-prone regions.

Data Information

Information found on this page is a derivative set, based on sources mentioned below.

Data Sources

We aggregate and combine data from USGS (United States Geographical Survey) and the EMSC (European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre). This allow us to get near real-time and historical earthquake data dating back to the year 1950.

Disclaimer

Information or data found on this page should not be used for, or as an early warning system. It is intended as an historical reference or near real-time complementary information to offical and governmental sources. In an event of an emergency it is important closely monitor and follow advice from national, state and local authorities.

Magnitude 1.7 Earthquake Struck 9 km NW of Avenal, CA on October 02, 2024 04:32:34
Date and Time
2024-10-02 04:32:34 (UTC)
Magnitude
1.7 Magnitude (richter scle)
Depth
9.2 km
Reports
0 people has reported that they felt this earthquake
Did you feel this earthquake?