Magnitude 4.4 Earthquake Struck 12 km ESE of Nueva Concepción, Guatemala on November 05, 2023 18:56:08
Last Updated: 2023-11-05 20:33:44On November 05, 2023 18:56:08 an earthquake with magnitude of 4.4 on the richter scale hit 12 km ESE of Nueva Concepción, Guatemala. The earthquake originated at a depth of approximately 90.784 kilometers below the Earth's surface on longitude -91.196° and latitude 14.161°. According to documented reports 2 people felt the earth quake, No tsunami was triggered due to the earthquake.
Magnitude & Depth
The earthquake that appeared on November 05, 2023 18:56:08 had a magnitude of 4.4 on the richter scale. Which is considered to be a minor earthquake and is often felt but causes little to no damage.
Shallow earthquakes are considered between 0 and 70 km deep, while intermediate earthquakes range from 70 - 300 km deep and deep earthquakes are between 300 - 700 km deep.
Are shallow earthquakes more destructive?
Shallow quakes generally tend to be more damaging than deeper quakes. Seismic waves from deep quakes have to travel farther to the surface, losing energy along the way.
Nearby Cities and Towns
The nearest significant population center is Nueva Concepción in Escuintla Department, Guatemala, located 12 kilometers or 7 miles ← W of the earthquake's epicenter. Other cities in close proximity include La Gomera (Escuintla Department, Guatemala) located 17 km (10 mi) → E and Tiquisate (Escuintla Department, Guatemala) located 22 km (13 mi) ← W of the epicenter.
In total, we found 180 cities in our database that might have been impacted by the earthquake.
Nearby Power Plants
We found a total 43 utility-scale power plants in the vecinity of the earthquakes epicenter. The closest being Olmeca I Waste power plant, located 22 kilometers (14 miles) ← W from the epicenter.
Distance | Direction | Power Plant | Type | Capacity |
---|---|---|---|---|
22 km (14 mi) | ← W | Olmeca I | Waste | 3.8 MW |
25 km (15 mi) | ↑ N | Madre Tierra | Biomass | 28.0 MW |
27 km (17 mi) | ↗ NE | DARSA | Oil | 5.0 MW |
28 km (17 mi) | ↗ NE | Pantaleon | Biomass | 82.0 MW |
28 km (17 mi) | → E | Magdalena | Biomass | 145.0 MW |
29 km (18 mi) | → E | Biomass | Biomass | 119.0 MW |
37 km (23 mi) | ↗ NE | El Capulin | Hydro | 3.5 MW |
38 km (23 mi) | → E | Trinidad | Biomass | 86.8 MW |
41 km (25 mi) | ↗ NE | SIDEGUA | Oil | 44.0 MW |
42 km (26 mi) | ↖ NW | Palo Gordo | Biomass | 76.9 MW |
43 km (26 mi) | ↗ NE | Tampa | Oil | 80.0 MW |
44 km (27 mi) | → E | San Jose | Coal | 139.0 MW |
44 km (27 mi) | ↗ NE | Las Palmas | Oil | 89.0 MW |
44 km (27 mi) | ↗ NE | Stewart & Stevenson | Oil | 51.0 MW |
44 km (27 mi) | ↗ NE | Las Palmas II | Coal | 83.0 MW |
44 km (27 mi) | ↗ NE | Escuintla Gas 5 | Oil | 41.9 MW |
44 km (27 mi) | ↗ NE | Escuintla Gas 3 | Oil | 35.0 MW |
47 km (29 mi) | ↗ NE | Concepcion | Biomass | 27.5 MW |
47 km (29 mi) | ↖ NW | Panan | Hydro | 7.3 MW |
48 km (29 mi) | ↗ NE | San Diego | Biomass | 5.0 MW |
51 km (31 mi) | → E | Jaguar Energy power station | Coal | 300.0 MW |
51 km (32 mi) | ↗ NE | El Salto | Hydro | 2.0 MW |
56 km (35 mi) | ↗ NE | Costa Sur | Coal | 30.2 MW |
58 km (36 mi) | ↗ NE | Jurun Marinala | Hydro | 60.0 MW |
59 km (36 mi) | ↗ NE | Palin II | Hydro | 5.8 MW |
63 km (39 mi) | ↗ NE | El Cobano | Hydro | 11.0 MW |
67 km (42 mi) | ↑ N | GECSA | Oil | 53.5 MW |
68 km (42 mi) | ↗ NE | Industria Textiles Del Lago | Oil | 70.0 MW |
68 km (42 mi) | ↗ NE | Electrogeneracion | Oil | 15.8 MW |
69 km (43 mi) | ↗ NE | Ortitlán | Geothermal | 25.2 MW |
72 km (45 mi) | ↗ NE | San Antonio El Sitio | Wind | 48.0 MW |
72 km (45 mi) | ↗ NE | Viento Blanco | Wind | 23.1 MW |
73 km (45 mi) | ↗ NE | Laguna Gas 1 | Oil | 17.0 MW |
74 km (46 mi) | ↗ NE | Laguna Gas 2 | Oil | 26.0 MW |
75 km (47 mi) | ↗ NE | Aguacapa | Hydro | 90.0 MW |
76 km (47 mi) | ↗ NE | La Libertad | Coal | 20.0 MW |
80 km (50 mi) | ↗ NE | Poza Verde | Hydro | 12.5 MW |
99 km (61 mi) | ↗ NE | Los Esclavos | Hydro | 15.0 MW |
100 km (62 mi) | ↗ NE | Las Vacas | Hydro | 39.0 MW |
122 km (75 mi) | ↗ NE | Generadora Progreso | Oil | 22.0 MW |
145 km (90 mi) | ↑ N | Chixoy | Hydro | 300.0 MW |
151 km (93 mi) | ↗ NE | Matanzas | Hydro | 12.0 MW |
156 km (96 mi) | ↗ NE | San Isidro | Hydro | 3.9 MW |
Power Plants & Risks During Earthquakes
We found 7 types of power plants in the vecinity of the magnitude 4.4 earthquake that struck 12 km ESE of Nueva Concepción, Guatemala on November 05, 2023 18:56:08. These types were Geothermal power plants, Wind power plants, Oil power plants, Hydro power plants, Biomass power plants, Waste power plants, Coal power plants, below you find information how each type of power plant can pose a risk to you as a person or the ecosytem around you.
None of this information should be used as guidence in an event of an emergency, but rather as additional references to information provided by national, state and local authorities.Hydropower
Hydropower plants are generally considered as safe in many aspects, but when it comes to severe earthquakes they pose a substantial risk that can manifest in the form of dam faliours, landslides and grave impacts on surrounding ecosystems.
Dam Failure
The most significant risk is the potential failure of the dam that holds the water reservoir. Severe ground shaking can damage or breach the dam, leading to downstream flooding and as a result endangering people and wildlife living downstream. Such an event can also have severe impact on key infrastructure that cascades through society.
Landslides
Earthquakes can trigger landslides in the areas surrounding hydropower plants, potentially damaging infrastructure and causing harm to nearby communities.
Damage to Aquatic Ecosystems
Both landslide and dam failures can have a severe impact on upstream and downstream aquatic wildlife, ecosystem and groundwater, resulting in longterm risks for people and industires living and operating in areas near the water supply.
To mitigate these risks, engineering and construction standards for hydropower plants often include earthquake-resistant designs. These designs incorporate measures such as flexible foundations, strengthened dam structures, and advanced monitoring systems to detect early signs of stress. Additionally, emergency plans and evacuation procedures should be in place to protect personnel and downstream communities in the event of a severe earthquake.
Wind Power
In the event of a severe earthquake, wind power plants typically pose lower risks to people and ecosystems compared to some other types of power generation, such as nuclear or fossil fuel power plants. Below you'll find potential risks to still consider.
Turbine Collapse
The most significant risk to people is the potential collapse of wind turbine towers during a severe earthquake. If a wind turbine were to collapse, it could cause injury or loss of life to anyone in the vicinity.
Wildlife Impact
Wind turbines can pose a risk to local wildlife. In the event of an earthquake, there could be concerns about the displacement or injury of wildlife in the vicinity of the turbines or wild fires resulting from internal malfunction of turbines.
While wind power plants do have risks associated with earthquakes, they are generally considered to be a lower-risk energy source in terms of environmental and safety concerns when compared to certain other forms of power generation. Proper planning, engineering, and maintenance practices help mitigate these risks and ensure the safe operation of wind power plants during earthquakes.
Oil Power
Oil-fired power plants can pose significant risks to society, people, and ecosystems in the event of a severe earthquake.
Oil Spills & Fires
One of the most immediate dangers is the risk of oil spills and fires. The shaking during an earthquake can rupture storage tanks and pipelines, leading to the release of large quantities of oil. Spilled oil can catch fire, causing explosions and further environmental damage.
Air Quality Polution
Oil fires and releases can result in the release of toxic fumes and particulate matter into the air. This can lead to poor air quality, posing health risks to nearby communities. People exposed to these pollutants may experience respiratory issues and other health problems.
Water Pollution
Spilled oil can contaminate nearby water bodies, including rivers, lakes, and groundwater. This can harm aquatic ecosystems, killing fish and other wildlife, and disrupting the food chain. Drinking water supplies may also be compromised, impacting human health.
Soil Contamination
Oil spills can saturate the soil, making it less fertile and potentially rendering it unusable for agriculture. Soil contamination can persist for years, affecting local food production.
Long-Term Environmental Damage
The environmental damage caused by oil spills and fires can persist long after the earthquake event. Cleanup efforts can be costly and challenging, and ecosystems may take years or even decades to recover fully.
To mitigate these risks, most modern oil-fired power plants follow strict regulations, safety measures, and extensive emergency response plans are in place for oil power plants located in seismically active regions. This includes robust containment systems, automatic shutdown mechanisms, and well-trained response teams.
Geothermal Power
Geothermal power plants, which harness the Earth's internal heat for electricity generation, can pose certain risks during earthquakes, but they are generally considered to be low-risk when compared to other types of power plants such as nuclear facilities.
Surface Instability
Severe ground shaking during an earthquake can cause surface instability, potentially leading to landslides, subsidence, or ground rupture near the geothermal power plant. This may affect infrastructure, access roads, and nearby ecosystems.
Release of Harmful Gases
Utility-scale geothermal reservoirs may contain naturally occurring gases, including hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Seismic activity could potentially release these gases into the atmosphere, posing health risks to nearby communities if not properly managed.
Damage to Wells and Piping
Geothermal power plants rely on wells and piping systems to extract hot water or steam from the Earth's crust. Earthquake-induced ground movement can damage or rupture these wells and pipelines, disrupting the power generation process.
The geothermal power industry places a strong emphasis on safety and works closely with regulatory authorities to ensure that geothermal energy is generated with minimal risk to people and the environment, especially in earthquake-prone regions of the world.
Biomass Power
Biomass power plants, which generate electricity by burning organic materials like wood, agricultural residues, or waste, can pose certain risks during earthquakes. While biomass power plants are generally considered less hazardous than some other types of power generation facilities, yet there are still potential risks to be aware of.
Fire Risk
One of the primary risks associated with biomass power plants during earthquakes is the potential for fires. The shaking during an earthquake can damage electrical systems, equipment, and fuel storage, which may lead to electrical faults and fires.
Fuel Handling
Earthquakes can disrupt the fuel handling systems in a biomass plant, potentially causing spills or accidents related to the storage and transportation of biomass feedstock.
It's important to note that the specific risks associated with biomass power plants can vary based on factors such as plant size, location, and design. The biomass power industry prioritizes safety and works closely with regulatory authorities to ensure that biomass energy is generated with minimal risk to people and the environment, even in earthquake-prone regions.
Data Information
Information found on this page is a derivative set, based on sources mentioned below.
Data Sources
We aggregate and combine data from USGS (United States Geographical Survey) and the EMSC (European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre). This allow us to get near real-time and historical earthquake data dating back to the year 1950.
Disclaimer
Information or data found on this page should not be used for, or as an early warning system. It is intended as an historical reference or near real-time complementary information to offical and governmental sources. In an event of an emergency it is important closely monitor and follow advice from national, state and local authorities.